Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Evaluating Sources free essay sample
Is the author affiliated with an organization related to the subject of the article? (Does he or she have an ulterior motive? ) The author is affiliated with the National Center for School Choice at Vanderbilt University, there would seem to be some affiliation. What is the authorââ¬â¢s experience with the subject, including related academic or professional credentials? (Is he or she qualified to interpret and explain the complexities of the subject? ) Marisa Cannata holds a PhD. From Michigan State University and a B. A. from Stanford University. Her research focuses on quality in education with teachers and staff in both traditional schools and charter schools. Does this article report on information experienced by the author, or is it a summary or retelling of information from other sources? (How close is the author to the actual information? ) The information and summary is retelling from reliable sources. There seems to be some questions from the author as to the need for further study. Is the information current? When was the information published or last updated? (Might there be resources with more current information? The information is current although there are some references used form 7 years ago, but reliable sources are used. In general, does the information in the source article match with information found in other sources, or is it different or unique? (Can this information be confirmed by more sources than just this one? ) The information does match the source information. The resources used are able to be crossed checked to confirm the information. Does the source make any claims without evidence to support them? The claims are all supported by facts or statistics. What makes this source credible? The article is supported by the National Center on School Choice, funded by the Department of Education. One concern is in the foot notes there is a line that states the information is the sole responsibility of the author. Source 2 Source Information Do Charter Schools Crowd out Private School Enrollment? Evidence from Michigan. Staff Report No. 472 Questions to Consider Answers (one sentence each should suffice) Is the author affiliated with an organization related to the subject of the article? The authors are affiliated with a The Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This paper is a staff report on how this effects enrollment. What is the authorââ¬â¢s experience with the subject, including related academic or professional credentials? (Is he or she qualified to interpret and explain the complexities of the subject? ) The authors have experience in this field in which they are writing these authors are economist from Georgetown University and the Reserve Bank of New York. Does this article report on information experienced by the author, or is it a summary or retelling of information from other sources? (How close is the author to the actual information? ) The article is a report of the information presented in the report. The article is a presentation of facts as it pertains to the case in Michigan. Is the information current? When was the information published or last updated? (Might there be resources with more current information? ) This information was published in 2010 and revised in 2011 this kind of information is timely. In general, does the information in the source article match with information found in other sources, or is it different or unique? (Can this information be confirmed by more sources than just this one? ) This information is cross referenced against other sources; the information is unique in that it is a staff report involving data regarding enrollment and how that impacts school systems. Does the source make any claims without evidence to support them? There is evidence to support all claims. What makes this source credible? This source is peer reviewed but again the Federal Reserve Bank of New York states that the work is that of the author, even though the article is a staff report. Source 3 Source Information Is Charter School Competition in California Improving the Performance of Traditional Public Schools? Questions to Consider Answers (one sentence each should suffice) Is the author affiliated with an organization related to the subject of the article? (Does he or she have an ulterior motive? ) The authors are from Michigan State University and the Rand Corporation. There does not appear to be an ulterior motive in the paper. What is the authorââ¬â¢s experience with the subject, including related academic or professional credentials? (Is he or she qualified to interpret and explain the complexities of the subject? ) Ron Zimmer is an associate professor from Michigan State University. Richard Buddin is a senior economist at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica. They have the credentials to write on this subject. Does this article report on information experienced by the author, or is it a summary or retelling of information from other sources? The information is a retelling of data in support of the facts of the article. The authors are close to the research in that one is an economist and the other is in education. Is the information current? When was the information published or last updated? (Might there be resources with more current information? ) This information is from 2009, I would consider there to be more current information on the subject. In general, does the information in the source article match with information found in other sources, or is it different or unique? The information is found in other sources, the information is presented in a narrative of data much like a staff report. The information can be confirmed through the Department of Education. Does the source make any claims without evidence to support them? All claims are backed with data and facts. What makes this source credible? This is article was published in the Public Administration Review and is based on a Rand Public school survey.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.